Exposing Calvinism: The Kind of God Calvinists Love

Picking up where we left off in the last Exposing Calvinism post, in the Soteriology 101 post "Frustrated by the state of the world?", the Calvinist Rhutchin says, "... Jeremiah can be read, 'something I did not command or mention, nor did it enter my mind [to command or mention].'”


I replied: 

I agree.  It never entered God’s mind to command child sacrifice.  But Calvinists would have to say that it never entered His mind to command it, but that He did irresistibly decree it anyway.  That He didn’t command them to sacrifice their children, but He did predestine it and cause it to happen.  And so, Calvinists would say that the people can be held accountable for doing something God said not to do even though He predestined/caused them break His command.  (So they disobey God’s spoken command in obedience to His hidden decree!  Isn’t that really just a different form of obedience?)  And that’s the kind of god Calvinists love, honor, worship, and serve!



Rhutchin (Calvinist) replied:

Heather writes, “But Calvinists would have to say that it never entered His mind to command it, but that He did irresistibly decree it anyway.  That He didn’t command them to sacrifice their children, but He did predestine it and cause it to happen.”

Well, God told Adam not to eat the fruit knowing that Adam would eat the fruit, didn’t He?  God gave Israel the Ten Commandments and the rest of the laws knowing that Israel would not keep either the commandments or the laws.

Then Heather says, “Calvinists would say that the people can be held accountable for doing something God said not to do even though He predestined/caused them break His command.”

Yep.  Jesus said, “No one can come to (believe in) me…”  That is because people are not born with faith.  And without faith, a person will follow his corrupt nature and sin.  God holds people accountable for their sin even though they could only sin because they lacked faith.

Then Heather says, “And that’s the kind of god Calvinists love, honor, worship, and serve!”

Yep.  Calvinists are overwhelmed that God would save anyone, much less them.



I replied:

Rhutchin says: “Well, God told Adam not to eat the fruit knowing that Adam would eat the fruit, didn’t He?  God gave Israel the Ten Commandments and the rest of the laws knowing that Israel would not keep either the commandments or the laws.”

Yes, but that’s not the honest Calvinist interpretation, now is it?  In Calvinism, God didn’t just “know” they would break His commands; He predestined that they would.  He gave them commands that He preplanned to cause them to break, giving them no choice to do anything otherwise (and then He punishes them for what He made them do).  That’s a big difference.

Then Rhutchin agrees with me that “Calvinists would say that the people can be held accountable for doing something God said not to do even though He predestined/caused them break His command.”  And he adds: “God holds people accountable for their sin even though they could only sin because they lacked faith.”  (Obviously meaning that they lacked the faith that God gave to the elect but withheld from them.)

Thank you for just admitting it outright, not trying to spin it or sugarcoat it.  That’s refreshing!

And then Rhutchin agrees that “that’s the kind of god Calvinists love, honor, worship, and serve!”  He says: “Yep. Calvinists are overwhelmed that God would save anyone, much less them.”

I’m sorry your god is so stingy with his love and grace (that his hate/wrath is so much bigger than his love/grace) that Calvinists have to be shocked that he would save anyone at all.  But if I had a wretched, unjust, untrustworthy god like Calvinism teaches, I’d be shocked too that that kind of god could love anyone.



Rhutchin replied:

Heather writes, “Yes, but that’s not the honest Calvinist interpretation, now is it?  In Calvinism, God didn’t just “know” they would break His commands; He predestined that they would.”

Yes.  God knew Adam would eat the fruit.  God could have decreed a different outcome.  God did not.  How is that different from the non-Calvinist theology?

Then Heather says, "he adds: 'God holds people accountable for their sin even though they could only sin because they lacked faith.'  (Obviously meaning that they lacked the faith that God gave to the elect but withheld from them.)”

It is God who gives faith to people.  So, the elect received faith and the non-elect did not.  So, duh!!!  Let’s see you explain it without sugarcoating it.

Then Heather says, “But if I had a wretched, unjust, untrustworthy god like Calvinism teaches, I’d be shocked too that that kind of god could love anyone.”

So, your God saves everyone – Right?



I replied:

Rhutchin says: “Yes.  God knew Adam would eat the fruit.  God could have decreed a different outcome.  God did not.  How is that different from the non-Calvinist theology?”

As explained time and time again ad infinitum: Non-Calvinists believe that God didn’t preplan/cause it to happen, just that He knew it would happen, allowed it to happen, and worked it into His plans, meaning that Adam truly made his own choice (that he had real options to choose between).  Calvinists would have to say that God preplanned it to happen, caused it to happen, and that Adam was simply making the decision that God predetermined he would make (and that God punished him for the choice God made him make).  I’m sorry you can’t see the difference.

(And despite the fact that Calvinists regularly accuse non-Calvinists of denying God’s foreknowledge because we don’t agree with their definition of foreknowledge, it’s the Calvinists who actually deny God’s foreknowledge.  Because Calvinists believe that foreknowing is essentially “fore-planning and then causing it to happen,” that God only “foreknows” what He Himself preplanned/causes.  Whereas non-Calvinists stick with the real meaning of foreknowing: knowing beforehand.  Not preplanning and causing.  It’s the Calvinists who deny God’s foreknowledge by changing it into something it isn’t.)

Rhutchin says: “It is God who gives faith to people.”

That’s a Calvinist presupposition without real biblical support (except for all the half-verses they twist out of context), and then Calvinists build their theology on it.  So you’ll have to excuse me for not accepting a theology that builds on unbiblical presuppositions.

Rhutchin says: “So, your God saves everyone – Right?”

Ah, back to the false Calvinist dichotomy of “Either God saves everyone or God elects certain people to save.”  If Calvinists are locked into this false dichotomy then it’s no wonder they can only side with “God elects certain people to save.”  (Calvinists have many false dichotomies meant to trap Christians into their theology: “Either God is in control or man is in control”… “Either God controls everything or God controls nothing”… “Either God is sovereign [their definition of sovereign] or He isn’t”… “Either God does all the work of saving us [the elect] or man saves himself” ... "If man had true free-will then all men would choose God, but since all men don't choose God, it means that God chooses who gets saved and who doesn't," etc.  They strategically leave out the biblically correct answer to force people to pick the Calvinist answer.)  

I’m sorry Calvinists can’t grasp the idea that God could make salvation available to all and then allow men to decide whether to accept it or reject it.  I mean, seriously, how hard is that to grasp?

A human example: A man buys 100 candy bars for 100 people in a room, and he puts them on the table and says “Anyone who wants one can come up and take one.”  He’s made it available for all.  He paid the price for all.  But he gives them the option to accept or reject it.

I don’t see why that’s such a difficult concept to grasp.

And in response to other Calvinist comments on this post … It’s funny to me that Calvinists always accuse non-Calvinists of being “man-centered” for saying that God loves all men and made salvation available to all men.  But to me, it sounds like Calvinists are the “man-centered” ones because of their hyper-focus on the “wretched, wicked, totally depraved” condition of man.  This hyper-focus on man’s “totally depraved” condition then causes them to minimize God’s love and grace and mercy, to the point that they have to be surprised that God would love/save anyone at all.  It all comes back to their over-focus on man’s “totally depraved” condition, using that as a starting point to figure out how God acts towards people.

But non-Calvinists focus on God’s character first, as He reveals Himself throughout the Bible: A God who is truly loving, compassionate, gracious, merciful, long-suffering, who is overflowing with love for ALL men, even those who will reject Him, who desires a relationship with everyone and who died for everyone to make salvation available for everyone because He wants everyone in heaven with Him.  But He lets us choose to accept it or reject it.

Non-Calvinists are humbled by, shocked by, how big God’s love is for all of us sinful people.  How gracious He is to humans who don’t deserve it.  How He would sacrifice Himself for us, even though many will reject Him anyway.  That is some amazing love!

Whereas Calvinists are shocked that their god would/could love even ONE person, putting a cap on God’s love/grace because of their hyper-focus on man’s “total depravity.”

Who’s man-centered now?

(You may have the last word, Rhutchin. I’m done.)


[And I have no idea how he responded because I didn't read his response.  I get tired of his nonsense.]  


Most Popular Posts Of The Month:

List of Calvinist Preachers, Authors, Theologians, Websites, etc.

I  found a lot more names to add to my list of known Calvinists (found in my various "How to Tell if a Church, Pastor, or Website is Calvinist" posts).  [FYI: I added a note at the bottom of this post on May 5, 2021.]    And so here it is, a "master list" of known Calvinists to help you be careful and discerning about who you listen to and where you get your theology from.  There are plenty more Calvinists out there, but these are just the names that I ran across the most.   These are either definite, self-professed Calvinists or "most likely Calvinists," in my estimation.  (I haven't heard of most of them, but it's good to know their theology before I do.)   After finding these names in various places online, I looked up each person to see if they are Calvinist.  If they did not self-identify as a Calvinist, I tried to figure it out based on the statements of faith of the groups/churches they belong to, the books they write, the t...
Read more

Is The ESV (English Standard Version) a Calvinist Bible?

Just in case anyone missed this post (the longer title made it easy to miss the "ESV" part) ... "A Random Verse That Destroys Calvinism (And "Is The ESV a Calvinist Bible?") In that post, I write about a bunch of verses that I believe were intentionally translated to be more Calvinistic or based on manuscripts that were too corrupt to be trusted (click on it to see the verses).   And why would I think that the translators of this Bible version would do that? (From that post...) The ESV and ESV Study Bible are majorly preferred by Calvinists.  In fact, it's often considered "The Calvinist Bible."   Why?  And why would translators of a Bible make these kinds of Calvinist tweaks to Scripture? Wayne Grudem and J.I. Packer were editors on the  ESV Study Bible   (this is for the ESV Global Study Bible).  Grudem and Packer are both popular, strong, dogmatic Calvinists.  Very Big Names in the world of Calvinism.  Grudem in the General E...
Read more

Why Is Calvinism So Dangerous? (re-updated)

Image
Because it  appears  to teach biblical truth while actually teaching  the opposite  - while using  manipulation and cult-like tactics to suck you in!  And it's spreading.  Stealthily, fast, aggressively. (We watched it happen firsthand in our church, which is why I wrote this blog.  See  "What's the best way to make people agree with your Calvinist views?"    Sadly, we ended up  leaving that church , a place we attended almost 20 years.) [ I updated this November 2022 to try to shorten it.  I failed.  But I hope it's more readable and streamlined at least.   If you only read one anti-Calvinism post of mine, I think it should be this one.  But I'm warning you, this post is long.  Very long.  So pack a lunch and bring a sleeping bag.  But it has to be long because Calvinism is so deceptively convoluted that it takes time to peel off the layers so that you can see it for what it really is.  ...
Read more

When Calvinists say "But predestination!" (shorter, basic version)

Image
[Finally, the much-shorter version - I said shorter, not short😉 - of my "But predestination!" series.  The longer version - full of many more Calvinist comments, my Calvinist ex-pastor's sermons, and my replies to them - can be found by  starting here .  But in this simplified version, I'm simply sharing the basics.  And I'll do a tiny version soon too, cutting out almost all quotes and memes.  But, oh, they add so much that it's hard to cut them out. ] At the heart of Calvinism is predestination and God's sovereignty (among other things, like "total depravity"), which according to Calvinism essentially amounts to: "God preplans and controls everything, even sin and evil and all our decisions, and so He pre-picks who goes to heaven and who goes to hell.  He causes the 'elect' to believe in Him and be saved, but He made sure the 'non-elect' have no chance or ability to believe and be saved because He predetermined they'd ...
Read more

How to Tell if a Church, Pastor, or Website is Calvinist (simplified version)

(For the extended version of this post, which I recommend, click here .  It is loaded with lots more information.  This simplified one is just the highlights.  And feel free to copy this and share it with others, to help them learn to identify Calvinism when they see it.  Just make sure to share the link to this blog so that they can find the original post.  Thank you.  New : For the super-short version, click here .  And FYI: I found a couple times when the Calvinist author of an article I linked to changed their article after I linked to it.  So if their article doesn't seem to match what I said about it, it may be because they altered it. ) We just left our church of almost 20 years because of the dogmatic Calvinist pastor who recently came on board.  ( Read my "Letter to Our Elders Regarding Calvinism Growing in Our Church" here.)   And I was thinking about what precautions I might take to make sure we didn't end up in another...
Read more

A Random Verse That Destroys Calvinism (And "Is The ESV a Calvinist Bible?")

(For just the "Is the ESV a Calvinist Bible" part of this post, click here .) In my normal Bible reading today, I came across a verse about "singleness vs. marriage" that destroys Calvinism in a few short words: "But the man who has settled the matter in his own mind, who is under no compulsion but who has control over his own will, and who has made up his mind not to marry the virgin - this man also does the right thing."   ( 1 Corinthians 7:37, NIV ) When you get past all the layers Calvinism wraps itself in to disguise the bad parts, it ultimately teaches - at the heart of it all - that God causes/controls  everything , even controlling our wills and causing our sins.  (But He then punishes  us  for the things He caused us to do, which would make Him unjust, no matter how much Calvinists try to deny it and cover it up.  See  this post  for some links about that.)  Calvinism ultimately teaches that everything we do is because God p...
Read more

"But Calvinists don't say God causes sin and evil!"

Image
If you point out to Calvinists that Calvinism's view of sovereignty - that God fore-ordains and orchestrates everything that happens and we had no ability to do anything differently - makes God the cause (and truly the only  voluntary cause) of all sin and evil, they'll probably respond with something like "That's not what we're saying.  You're putting words in our mouths.  And you don't understand Calvinism."   When they do that, show them a few of these quotes -  Ca lvinists' own words about their beliefs of God's sovereignty and how He preplans, will, ordains, orchestrates, directs (code words for "causes")  everything  that happens.  And then ask them if they still think you're really misunderstanding them.  (Bold emphasis added) [And before reading the quotes, here's a great, satirical 4-minute video that I think everyone should see:  Hitler and Calvinism .  Awesome!] 1. R.C. Sproul Jr.  ( Almighty Over All) :  ...
Read more

Leaving Calvinism: Comments from Ex-Calvinists #11

Here is the last of the ex-Calvinist testimonies.  The first one is from this post:  X-Calvinist Corner .   (It's an Arminian website, but I am not Arminian.)  I am going to highlight some of the comments that stood out to me the most.  If you want to read everything that everyone said, click on the link above: Dana Steele writes: I grew up in a Calvinistic Baptist church from age 11.  The 5-points of Calvinism (TULIP) were taught regularly with great enthusiasm ... But it wasn’t until college that I began to understand and embrace the “Doctrines of Grace” and TULIP more fully....  I also learned to love the doctrine of election because it meant that God loved me personally and specifically in a unique way.  Though it made me a little embarrassed to think that God did not love everyone this way, I was content to leave this as a mystery.  Who am I to question God?  I was just glad I was one of the lucky (I mean chosen) ones. ... [As ...
Read more

The Cult of Calvinism

Here are links to a few posts that reveal the cult-like side of Calvinism: "Why Calvinism is a Cult" "Calvinism is a Counterfeit Christian Cult" "Calvinism, Cults, and Control" I left a comment at Hoppers Crossing Christian Church about their post "Calvinism, Cults, and Control."  I will also print my comment here for your information: I was reading your post "Calvinism, Cults, and Control" (2/02/20) and so much of what you said fits the Calvinist church we recently left.  Here are some of the cult-like things that happened after a Calvinist pastor took over our non-Calvinist church: 1.   From the beginning, he started laying the groundwork that disagreement with him (about his Calvinist view of predestination and God's sovereignty, in particular) was not allowed and that anyone who did disagree with him was unhumble and disagreeing with God.   Things like (paraphrases): "Humble people have no problem with God's sovereignty...
Read more

When Calvinism Infiltrates Your Church

A note I recently added to my posts on "How to tell if a Church, Pastor, or Website is Calvinist" : On a personal note : After having seen firsthand how Calvinism stealthily infiltrates and takes over a church, I want to share with you something that Kevin from Beyond the Fundamentals said in the video   "Stealth Calvinism in Oklahoma"  (my paraphrase): "By the time you realize what's going on and start looking up information about Calvinism online, it's too late."   Calvinist pastors who set out to take over non-Calvinist churches are banking on the fact that most people don't know what Calvinism is, giving the pastors plenty of time to weave in Calvinism in sneaky, subtle, tricksy ways before people catch on to (and research) the red flags.  (*See note at bottom about deceptive pastors.)  By that time, too many people in the church have been suckered into Calvinism (without realizing it's called Calvinism), believing that they're just...
Read more