It breaks my heart, but...
But instead of answering their question about if she should be stoned, Jesus writes on the ground and says “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.”
And one by one, all the accusers leave. (I think it’s interesting that the older ones left first. I think as we age, if we've gone through enough of our own trials, heartaches, and sinful struggles, we lose some of that dogmatic, judgmental, self-righteousness that we might have had when we were young. Because we learned that we are human and that we fail and fall and break and stumble just like everyone else, and this helps us have compassion on others who are human too.)
I think there are two very important lessons in this story:
A. Jesus was more disturbed by the unforgiving, self-righteous attitudes of the “spiritual elite” than He was by the guilty woman. He cared more about protecting her than about impressing the religious snobs. And this should be sobering to those of us who are more bothered by what everyone else is doing wrong than by what we're doing wrong, to those of us who are so eager to accept the forgiveness, compassion, grace, mercy that we don’t deserve, but so unwilling to give it to others who need it too.
[Did you ever wonder why Jesus wrote on the ground instead of just saying what He wanted to say like He did every other time? I think it was an incredible act of mercy and compassion for the woman. If the hateful, condemning, judgmental people wanted to see what Jesus said, they had to shift their focus off of the trembling, exposed, completely-ashamed woman and look to the ground instead. Not only did this spare the woman from their condemning gaze, but they had to lower their heads, lower their eyes, which is the opposite of what prideful, arrogant, self-righteous people do. And maybe, along with whatever Jesus wrote on the ground, it was the physical act of mimicking a humble posture, of looking away from the sin of another person, of lowering their heads and their eyes, that made them more inclined to look within themselves at their own sins, at their own bad heart attitudes. They realized that in the eyes of God, they were no better than the adulterous woman, no less sinful, naked, exposed, or guilty than her. And they felt shame, the same kind of shame they were heaping on her. In the eyes of God, she was them, and they were her. And so they dropped their rocks and left. What a brilliant act of mercy and compassion and conviction! (But would we except anything less from Jesus!)]
B. And Jesus wasn’t nearly as concerned with where the woman was coming from, because He was much too concerned with where she was going. “‘Then neither do I condemn you,’ Jesus declared. ‘Go now and leave your life of sin.’” (John 8:11). He didn't care about her past as much as He did her future.
Jesus cares much more about where we're going than where we've been. He cares more about the potential for us to get our life right than He does about what we did wrong. It's not whether we sin or not that's the bigger issue with God (because we'll all sin), but it's what we do after we sin, how we handle it. Do we wallow in our sins, harden ourselves in our sins... or do we repent, pick ourselves back up, and start following Jesus again?
Jesus wants to forgive our sins and help us get past them, not remind us of them and condemn us for them.
Maybe religious snobs want to pour shame on others for what they've done wrong, rubbing their noses in it, condemning them for it.
But not Jesus. Jesus wants to pour on His love, grace, mercy, and forgiveness. He wants to free us from shame, not find more things to shame us about.
The religious snobs wanted to give the woman death, but Jesus wanted to give her life. And so instead of encouraging the throwing of stones, Jesus stopped them, even when He alone had every right to throw one.
Oh, that we were more like Jesus!
I will continue to learn from Dr. Evans' teaching while praying for his healing and restoration. Regardless of his sin, he is still far more biblical in his teaching than most pastors out there today, especially Calvinist ones.
[And of course, I'm really hoping that Tony's unnamed sin, which he says is nothing against the law, is more like a momentary lapse of judgment, maybe something he did in his youth or out of despair after his wife died, and not something like having an ongoing affair, taking advantage of women, or abusing his position of power. To me, those are different levels of sin which call for a different response, different levels of compassion, understanding, and continued respect for the person. And so until we know more, I have to give him the benefit of the doubt. But, ugh, it still breaks my heart!]
