Many are Called, Few are Chosen (Tony Evans' Interpretation)

There are some verses in the Bible that will always be confusing and cause disagreement.  And the "many are called/invited, few are chosen" verse is one of them.

Matthew 22:1-14: "The kingdom of heaven is like a king who prepared a wedding banquet for his son.  He sent his servants to those who had been invited to the banquet to tell them to come, but they refused to come.... So his servants went out into the streets and gathered all the people they could find, both good and bad, and the wedding hall was filled with guests.  But when the king came in to see the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing wedding clothes.  'Friend,' he asked, 'how did you get in here without wedding clothes?' The man was speechless.  Then the king told the attendants, 'Tie him hand and foot, and throw him outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.' 'For many are invited, but few are chosen.'"

Some people think this is about unbelievers or false Christians being sent to hell (but how could unbelievers have even gotten into the "wedding feast"?).  Some think it's about believers losing their salvation, which I don't think is possible.  And I've wondered if being sent to "outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth" could be about backslidden believers losing their place in the rapture or missing out on eternal rewards/blessings.  [FYI, I think the "fiery furnace where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matthew 13:42, 13:50) might be different than the "outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matthew 8:12, 25:30, and I'd say 24:51).  I lean towards thinking these are two different times/places when people weep and gnash their teeth: the first is when unbelievers are sent to hell, the second is some sort of punishment/loss for believers who didn't live as they should (which is why it's tied to warnings of watching for Jesus to return, of living ready for His coming).  But this is just my idea.] 

But Calvinists think this passage is about God choosing who gets into His Kingdom, into heaven.  They think that "many are called" means God gives a general call of salvation to all people but that only a "few are chosen" by God to be saved.  They think this supports the idea of election, that God chooses who gets saved and causes the chosen ones to respond to the gospel call.

And, of course, I don't agree with them.  [I could agree if it was that God calls all people to be saved (giving them all a genuine, real chance to be saved) but that He only saves those who choose to willingly believe in Jesus, that He chooses those who first choose Him.]

I think it has to be something other than support for Calvinist election.  


And after reading a note on this verse in the Tony Evans' Study Bible, I've now got another possible way of looking at it that does not support Calvinism.  Dr. Evans gives an interpretation I'd never thought of before but that's definitely worth considering, especially since he is my favorite and most trusted pastor/theologian (far surpassing any Calvinist theologian out there!).  Here it is, mingled with my added explanations:

According to Dr. Evans, this parable about being thrown into outer darkness isn't about eternal "heaven or hell" salvation at all or about being kicked out of heaven.  It's about the millennial kingdom, when Jesus comes back again to rule on earth for 1000 years.  The man without the proper clothes is a true believer, but he wasn't living the way true believers should be living when Jesus comes back again.  And because of this (and even though he was raptured with all true believers), he lost the rewards and full blessings he could've received in the millennial kingdom: specifically, the right to rule alongside Jesus.  And it caused him great emotional pain.  (This is close to my idea that true believers could possibly miss out on the rapture - because it's about true believers losing something but not their salvation and it explains the repeated warnings to be ready for Jesus to return.)

Dr. Evans says that "many are called, few are chosen" means that while all believers are called to the millennial kingdom, only a few - the faithful ones - will be chosen to rule alongside Jesus during those 1000.

I'd never thought about this before, that the "outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth" could be about the millennial kingdom.  It's a whole different way of looking at it, something interesting to chew on, to consider.  And it may just help tie everything together: the truths that God doesn't choose who gets saved, that true believers can't lose their salvation but can lose spiritual rewards/blessings, and that God repeatedly warns believers to be ready for when Jesus comes back again.

This might just be the key to the puzzle.


Of course, you don't have to see things my way or Dr. Evans' way or anyone else's way.  We should all be reading the Word for ourselves, wrestling with its teachings, being teachable, and growing in spiritual knowledge and wisdom as we grow in the faith.

But I will say this: After years of reading/hearing various theologians' and pastors' theological views, I totally, highly, and 100% recommend Dr. Tony Evans.  To me, he is one of the most accurate (and practical) theologian out there.  And even after 37 years of being a Christian, I still learn something new from him all the time.

Seriously, I think everyone should have the Tony Evans Study Bible and his Theology You Can Count On book.  (And he's got a huge, great commentary which I'm going to read through this year as my New Year's Resolution.)  

Get these and read through them.  Read through the Bible while reading his study notes.  The more you do, the more pleasantly surprised you'll be by how easy the Bible is to understand (so much easier than confusing, contradictory Calvinism), how encouraging it is (so much more soul-filling, heart-healing, and faith-strengthening than Calvinism's depressing, fatalistic views of God and salvation and human life, etc.), how trustworthy God is (so much more than the two-faced, deceptive, double-talking Calvi-god), and how practical the lessons of the Bible are (so much more than the lofty, high-and-might, overly intellectual teachings of Calvinism).

Seriously, get these resources from Dr. Evans and you won't be sorry.  And you'll be well on your way to knowing God as He should be known and to understanding God's Word as He meant it to be understood.  And your faith and heart will thank you for it.  

Most Popular Posts Of The Month:

List of Calvinist Preachers, Authors, Theologians, Websites, etc.

I  found a lot more names to add to my list of known Calvinists (found in my various "How to Tell if a Church, Pastor, or Website is Calvinist" posts).  [FYI: I added a note at the bottom of this post on May 5, 2021.]    And so here it is, a "master list" of known Calvinists to help you be careful and discerning about who you listen to and where you get your theology from.  There are plenty more Calvinists out there, but these are just the names that I ran across the most.   These are either definite, self-professed Calvinists or "most likely Calvinists," in my estimation.  (I haven't heard of most of them, but it's good to know their theology before I do.)   After finding these names in various places online, I looked up each person to see if they are Calvinist.  If they did not self-identify as a Calvinist, I tried to figure it out based on the statements of faith of the groups/churches they belong to, the books they write, the things they say o
Read more

Is The ESV (English Standard Version) a Calvinist Bible?

Just in case anyone missed this post (the longer title made it easy to miss the "ESV" part) ... "A Random Verse That Destroys Calvinism (And "Is The ESV a Calvinist Bible?") In that post, I write about a bunch of verses that I believe were intentionally translated to be more Calvinistic or based on manuscripts that were too corrupt to be trusted (click on it to see the verses).   And why would I think that the translators of this Bible version would do that? (From that post...) The ESV and ESV Study Bible are majorly preferred by Calvinists.  In fact, it's often considered "The Calvinist Bible."   Why?  And why would translators of a Bible make these kinds of Calvinist tweaks to Scripture? Wayne Grudem and J.I. Packer were editors on the  ESV Study Bible   (this is for the ESV Global Study Bible).  Grudem and Packer are both popular, strong, dogmatic Calvinists.  Very Big Names in the world of Calvinism.  Grudem in the General Editor and Packe
Read more

How to Tell if a Church, Pastor, or Website is Calvinist (simplified version)

(For the extended version of this post, which I recommend, click here .  It is loaded with lots more information.  This simplified one is just the highlights.  And feel free to copy this and share it with others, to help them learn to identify Calvinism when they see it.  Just make sure to share the link to this blog so that they can find the original post.  Thank you.  New : For the super-short version, click here .  And FYI: I found a couple times when the Calvinist author of an article I linked to changed their article after I linked to it.  So if their article doesn't seem to match what I said about it, it may be because they altered it. ) We just left our church of almost 20 years because of the dogmatic Calvinist pastor who recently came on board.  ( Read my "Letter to Our Elders Regarding Calvinism Growing in Our Church" here.)   And I was thinking about what precautions I might take to make sure we didn't end up in another Calvinist church (that is, whe
Read more

Why Is Calvinism So Dangerous? (re-updated)

Image
Because it  appears  to teach biblical truth while actually teaching  the opposite  - while using  manipulation and cult-like tactics to suck you in!  And it's spreading.  Stealthily, fast, aggressively. (We watched it happen firsthand in our church, which is why I wrote this blog.  See  "What's the best way to make people agree with your Calvinist views?"    Sadly, we ended up  leaving that church , a place we attended almost 20 years.) [ I updated this November 2022 to try to shorten it.  I failed.  But I hope it's more readable and streamlined at least.   If you only read one anti-Calvinism post of mine, I think it should be this one.  But I'm warning you, this post is long.  Very long.  So pack a lunch and bring a sleeping bag.  But it has to be long because Calvinism is so deceptively convoluted that it takes time to peel off the layers so that you can see it for what it really is.  My hope is that with this one long post, I can show the deceptiveness of
Read more

A Random Verse That Destroys Calvinism (And "Is The ESV a Calvinist Bible?")

(For just the "Is the ESV a Calvinist Bible" part of this post, click here .) In my normal Bible reading today, I came across a verse about "singleness vs. marriage" that destroys Calvinism in a few short words: "But the man who has settled the matter in his own mind, who is under no compulsion but who has control over his own will, and who has made up his mind not to marry the virgin - this man also does the right thing."   ( 1 Corinthians 7:37, NIV ) When you get past all the layers Calvinism wraps itself in to disguise the bad parts, it ultimately teaches - at the heart of it all - that God causes/controls  everything , even controlling our wills and causing our sins.  (But He then punishes  us  for the things He caused us to do, which would make Him unjust, no matter how much Calvinists try to deny it and cover it up.  See  this post  for some links about that.)  Calvinism ultimately teaches that everything we do is because God preplanned it, ordai
Read more

Posts in the "Predestination vs. Free-Will" Series

I will post this at the beginning and end of the "Predestination vs. Free-Will" series.  (This is the beginning of it.)   These four are the really long posts that I broke up into smaller pieces for the series: Predestination Does Not Mean "No Choice" Controversial "Predestination" Verse Does Romans Teach Predestination? Does Ephesians Teach Predestination? These are the smaller posts of the "predestination vs. free-will" series, in order: Is Our Eternity Decided For Us? "Predestination vs. Free-Will" Overview Should "Predestination vs. Free-Will" Matter To Christians? Predestination Manipulation Does "In Control" Mean "Controlling Everything"? How Could A Loving God Condemn People To Hell? Sovereignty And Free-Will Working Together What Does "God Is Sovereign" Mean? Does God Cause Childhood Abuse?
Read more

A Calvinist's best defense of their worst doctrine

Image
The following are parts of two sermons  given by the Calvinist pastor at my ex-church, about Romans 9 and predestination.   [I'd post a link to them, but if you know which church I attended then you'll know which town I live in, and I'm not ready to reveal that.  So you'll just have to trust me that this is what he said.  And for those who already know me or attend my ex-church, these sermons are from  June of 2016.  You  can look it up online if you want.] This was a little over 3 years after this new pastor was hired and brought in Calvinism, stealthy at first, then much more bold.  And by this point, I was done with him, really fed up and upset with his teaching, really alarmed.  Sadly, though, we stayed there listening to this garbage for 3 more years before we resigned our membership.  (But at least it gave me a lot of time to really hear and research what he was preaching.)   Notice that all these sermon sections contain are shaming, manipulation, deflection, bad
Read more

When Calvinism Infiltrates Your Church

A note I recently added to my posts on "How to tell if a Church, Pastor, or Website is Calvinist" : On a personal note : After having seen firsthand how Calvinism stealthily infiltrates and takes over a church, I want to share with you something that Kevin from Beyond the Fundamentals said in the video   "Stealth Calvinism in Oklahoma"  (my paraphrase): "By the time you realize what's going on and start looking up information about Calvinism online, it's too late."   Calvinist pastors who set out to take over non-Calvinist churches are banking on the fact that most people don't know what Calvinism is, giving the pastors plenty of time to weave in Calvinism in sneaky, subtle, tricksy ways before people catch on to (and research) the red flags.  (*See note at bottom about deceptive pastors.)  By that time, too many people in the church have been suckered into Calvinism (without realizing it's called Calvinism), believing that they're just
Read more

Calvinist Hogwash #5: Rejoicing about hell

Image
(Some of these quotes might've better fit the  "hell and justice"  post, but I didn't find them in time, so I put them here.) Some Calvinists seem to think that it's most God-honoring to rejoice about hell, to celebrate the fact that Calvi-god predestines non-elect people to hell to show off his justice, for his glory.  They  sensationalize the glory of it all and say that it's better for the elect that there are people in hell.   They say that if God gets glory by predestining people to hell [they're wrong!], then it's wrong to get upset about it.      Of course, most Calvinists don't go to that extreme, but it's quite sickening when they do.   C. Matthew McMahon  ( The Two Wills of God ,  pg 349 ):  " The saints should delight in the reprobation of the wicked... We come to understand and praise God concerning the damnation of other people.  We understand that we could have been what they are.  We contemplate their eternal destiny, and bo
Read more

Calvinist Hogwash #4 (hell and justice)

Image
I think that Calvinists who deny double predestination are fooling themselves.  To not choose someone for heaven is to choose them for hell, especially if those are the only two options and if God created them to be exactly who they are for certain reasons (which He didn't, except in Calvinism).   Instead of just admitting that Calvi-god predestines people for hell, Calvinists soften or obscure it as much as possible to make it seem less harsh, less deliberate, than it is: "God passes over people... He just lets them be the sinners they already are... He leaves them to themselves... He doesn't force them to reject Him, He just doesn't give them saving faith..."  (I wonder if they'd try so much to soften it if they thought themselves one of the non-elect.)   It's  really just haggling over terminology because it all amounts to the same thing: I n Calvinism, God predetermined that the non-elect would be who they are and do what they do, and He made sure that
Read more